Frontier Radar · FR-0011 · 30 August 2026

Open knowledge standards and OpenWiki

poc

Decision question

Should Frontier Radar test OpenWiki and Open Knowledge Format as a portable, claim-grounded maintenance layer for its Markdown corpus?

Short answer

Yes. This is the closest fit in the backlog: Frontier Radar already needs provenance, freshness, supersession, and rebuildable Markdown. A trial can test whether OpenWiki's Grounded Claims and OKF metadata improve those properties without surrendering human review or the existing corpus.

Evidence and examples

Assessment

Source claim: OpenWiki connects claims to exact source evidence and emits portable knowledge metadata.

Inference: A parallel trial on Frontier Radar can test value without replacing the current reviewed records. The critical questions are diff quality, claim stability, source precision, retraction behavior, and whether generated churn remains reviewable.

Measured experiment results: none in Frontier Radar.

Limitations and unresolved questions

Recommendation

poc — generate an OpenWiki/OKF view of Frontier Radar in an isolated branch, inject known source changes and retractions, and compare its outputs with the existing Markdown/OpenContext pipeline.

Next decision

Approve a non-destructive Frontier Radar trial with explicit freshness, retraction, provenance, and churn success criteria.